This post is part one in a four-part series of posts on avoiding a derailed public safety IT project.
If you’ve been involved in a public safety system procurement in your career, you know that the process is anything but simple. Public safety system procurements are complicated undertakings that are time-consuming, risky, and often under-resourced by the agency completing the upgrade.
What can public safety agencies do to increase their success rate? We recently shared some ideas during a Mission Critical Partners (MCP) webinar (listen to it on-demand here). To help you succeed, we’ve included some of the takeaways and best practices in this article.
Because of the complexity associated with this process, we will cover these tips in a four-part series that provides a step-by-step overview of what’s important leading up to an implementation.
Read on for best practices that will increase your success in the needs assessment and develop requirements phase of your project.These needs assessment/requirements phase best practices are:
How many major projects have you been a part of in your career without a project charter? This is seldom done despite being one of the most critical project elements. The purpose of developing a charter is to define what your agency is trying to accomplish as well as defining:
Kicking off a project without a charter is a risky endeavor. The charter protects all of the stakeholders involved ranging from the management team to ancillary employees that aren’t directly involved, but are impacted by its success or failure.
You don’t know what you don’t know. This is the essence of what you’re trying to uncover when you’re completing the needs assessment process. Ask yourself these questions:
MCP recommends partnering with a third-party for the needs assessment stage in order to obtain the most objective point-of-view possible.
Without a third party, it can also be challenging to determine what operational issues exist that technology cannot solve. (Read more about our technology procurement and implementation services.)
In addition to a third party, a cross-section of users, supervisors, management, and system administrators should be involved. Whatever you do, avoid having one person or a small group define your needs for a system that plays such an important role in defining your agency’s future.
Implementing new technology extends far beyond a specific technology solution. You need to be well-positioned from every angle to accommodate your change. Ask yourself these questions:
Is your team capable of undertaking the transition and implementing the new solution?
Once your selected vendor hits the ground running, having the right team assembled will make your transition much quicker and trouble-free. Plan for your needs from a budget and staffing standpoint today and for the long-term to guarantee the success of your technology investment throughout its lifecycle.
If you do not take the time to carefully define what you want with a system, you’ll struggle during the testing phase. Every element of your new system should pass a rigorous testing process. Some ways we suggest you research:
CONCLUSION:
These are just some tips that will help you nail the needs assessment and system requirements phase, setting you up for future success with your request for proposal and implementation process down the line. Stay tuned for future posts on what you should include in your RFP, how to evaluate the vendors that responded and what’s critical to the vendor selection process and best and final offer (BAFO) proposals.