MCP Insights by Mission Critical Partners

Strengthening Cybersecurity Through a GRC Lens: Key Practices Aligned with CJIS Security Policy 6.0

Written by Jason Franks | April 28, 2025

As cyber threats grow more sophisticated, compliance frameworks like the Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Security Policy, version 6.0, have evolved to demand a more rigorous and structured approach to cybersecurity.

At Mission Critical Partners, we align all security practices through a comprehensive Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) model — helping public-safety agencies and CJIS-covered entities implement cybersecurity practices that are not only effective but also compliant.

This post examines four key cybersecurity domains and their implications for both GRC and the latest CJIS updates.

Domain #1: Impact Analysis and Control Verification

CJIS Alignment

CJIS 6.0 emphasizes a more risk-based approach to information protection, stressing the importance of ongoing control verification. Control reviews must be regular, and the effectiveness of policies and procedures must be validated against operational needs.

GRC Integration

  • Governance: Policy leadership sets thresholds for impact and acceptable risk.
  • Risk: Impact assessments guide prioritization within the risk register.
  • Compliance: Ongoing control verification satisfies CJIS audit preparation and risk mitigation.

Best Practice

Tie control-validation findings into your Plan of Actions and Milestones (POA&M) and ensure that risk-impact levels are justified and documented per CJIS expectations.

Domain #2: Enhanced System Inventory Requirements

CJIS Alignment

Under CJIS 6.0, agencies must maintain an accurate inventory of all systems, devices, and applications accessing criminal-justice information. CJIS now places greater emphasis on endpoint management, including mobile and cloud assets.

GRC Integration

  • Governance: Formal asset ownership and reporting structure.
  • Risk: Asset categorization supports risk ranking based on business impact.
  • Compliance: System inventory must be current, documented, and auditable per CJIS audit-readiness standards.

Best Practice

Utilize tools such as Configuration Management Databases (CMDBs) and automated discovery platforms to track all assets and report on their access to criminal justice information.

Domain #3: Configuration Settings Best Practices

CJIS Alignment

CJIS 6.0 emphasizes the importance of secure baseline configurations, recommending the removal of all default accounts, disabling unnecessary services, and securing administrative access. These configuration expectations now extend into virtual environments and cloud services.

GRC Integration

  • Governance: Enforce minimum security baseline configurations for all system types.
  • Risk: Misconfigurations are logged and tracked as risks in the register.
  • Compliance: Adherence to baseline settings is necessary for CJIS technical- and physical-security compliance.

Best Practice

Implement continuous compliance monitoring to detect and automatically remediate deviations from secure baselines.

Domain #4: Protecting Information Location

CJIS Alignment
CJIS 6.0 increases focus on data-location awareness — especially with the rise of cloud adoption. CJIS requires that agencies know exactly where criminal-justice information is stored, processed, and transmitted, including the geographic and jurisdictional boundaries involved.

GRC Integration

  • Governance: Establish policies for data residency and classification.
  • Risk: Assess risks tied to cloud services and third-party data handling.
  • Compliance: Maintain documentation that maps criminal-justice-information data flows and storage locations for CJIS audits.

Best Practice

Use data classification and discovery tools to identify criminal-justice information, to map data flows, and to enforce access/location controls based on CJIS jurisdictional mandates.

The latest CJIS updates are not just technical — they reflect a broader shift toward risk-driven, governance-based cybersecurity. Agencies that align their cybersecurity efforts with a GRC framework not only will meet CJIS compliance requirements more efficiently and effectively, but also will build a stronger, more resilient security posture.

At Mission Critical Partners, we help law-enforcement agencies, 911 centers, and public-sector organizations embed CJIS requirements directly into their operational GRC strategy — reducing audit stress, improving visibility, and enhancing incident preparedness.

Want to get CJIS ready with a GRC strategy tailored to your environment? Let’s talk.

Related Posts

Inside the New CJIS Security Policy Requirements: What You Need to Know

Updated NIST Cybersecurity Framework Places Greater Emphasis on Governance

Cybersecurity Governance and Why It’s an Indispensable Element of Effective Cybersecurity Planning